Mary Seacole

“I am not ashamed to confess that I love to be of service to those who need a woman's help. And wherever the need arises—on whatever distant shore—I ask no greater or higher privilege than to minister to it.”


Mary Jane Seacole (1805-1881) was born Mary Jane Grant in Jamaica, the daughter of a white Scottish lieutenant and a free Jamaican woman. Her mother, nicknamed "The Doctress", was a hotelier and healer who used traditional Caribbean and African herbal remedies who had learned importance and useful hygiene and medical practices when caring for slaves on sugar plantations. (Incidentally, such ‘doctresses’ preached the use of good hygiene a century before Florence Nightingale).

In her autobiography, Seacole describes learning her medical knowledge from observing her mother – practising first on dolls and pets and then aiding her mother in the treatment of human patients. Her close family ties with the army also enabled her to observe the military doctors, giving her a unique blend of West African and British medical techniques – which she used with great success.

Seacole was proud of both her Jamaican and Scottish ancestry, and referred to herself as a ‘Creole’ - commonly used in a racially neutral sense or to refer to the children of white settlers with indigenous women. Legally, however, she was classified as a ‘mulatto’ a multiracial person which gave her limited political rights. In her autobiography, Seacole describes her efforts to disprove the stereotype of the ‘lazy Creole’, and her pride at her black identity: ‘I am proud of the relationship – to those poor mortals whom you once held enslaved, and whose bodies America still owns."

In the late 18th century, the West Indies were an outpost of the British Empire and a source of one-third of Britian’s foreign trade. Thus, huge numbers of British troops succumbed to tropical diseases for which they were unprepared, providing West Indian nurses such as Seacole with large numbers of patients on a regular basis.  Mary Seacole spent some years in the household of an elderly woman, her "kind patroness", with whom she received a good education. As the educated daughter of a Scottish officer and a free black woman with a respectable business, Seacole would have held a high position in Jamaican society

In about 1821, Seacole visited London, staying for a year visiting relatives. Although London had a number of black people, she records that her companions were ‘taunted’ by children – while she herself was white-passing owing to her Scottish father. Her later travels would be as an "unprotected" woman, without a chaperone were highly unusual.

After returning to Jamaica, Seacole nursed her patroness and returned to her family when she died a few years later. Seacole then worked alongside her mother, occasionally being called to assist at the British Army hospital. She also travelled the Caribbean.

She married Edwin Horatio Hamilton Seacole in November 1836. She gives her marriage only nine lines of her autobiography – the gal clearly had her priorities in order and knew even then that her career was a more important legacy than her marriage! Edwin was a merchant and seems to have had a poor constitution and an unsuccessful business.

During 1843 and 1844, Seacole suffered a series of personal disasters. Her family hospital and boarding house burnt down in 1843. The following year, she lost both her husband and her mother. After a period of being paralysed by grief, she "turned a bold front to fortune" and assumed the management of her mother's hotel. She put her rapid recovery down to her hot Creole blood, blunting the "sharp edge of [her] grief" sooner than Europeans who she thought "nurse their woe secretly in their hearts". She emersed herself in work, declining many offers of marriage. She later became widely known and respected, particularly among the European military visitors to Jamaica. She treated patients in the 1850 cholera epidemic, correctly attributing its outbreak to contagion from a steamer ship from America. This first-hand experience would benefit her during the next five years.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In 1851, Seacole travelled to Panama to visit her brother. Shortly after her arrival, the town was struck by cholera. She saved the first victim, establishing her reputation as a competent doctor. Her successes were limited, but she remained the most competent doctor in the area. An autoposy she performed on a young orphan gave her a "decidedly useful" insight into the disease. However, she herself contracted cholera and took several weeks to recuperate while she was cared for by locals.  

Despite the problems of disease and climate, Panama remained the favoured route between the coasts of the United States, and Seacole saw this as an opportunity to establish a restaurant and barber to catch the passing trade. Seeing a business opportunity, Seacole opened the British Hotel, which was a restaurant rather than an hotel. She described it as a "tumble down hut," with two rooms, the smaller one to be her bedroom, the larger one to serve up to 50 diners. She soon added the services of a barber.[61]On moving cities from the wet season, she remembers an encounter with a white American that gave a leaving speech for her: asking the listeners to join with him in rejoicing that "she's so many shades removed from being entirely black" stating "if we could bleach her by any means we would [...] and thus make her acceptable in any company[,] as she deserves to be". Seacole was not amused and replied that she did not:

"appreciate your friend's kind wishes with respect to my complexion. If it had been as dark as any nigger's, I should have been just as happy and just as useful, and as much respected by those whose respect I value." 
 She also noted the positions of responsibility taken on by escaped American slaves in Panama, as well as in the priesthood, the army, and public offices: "it is wonderful to see how freedom and equality elevate men".

In Gorgona, Seacole briefly ran a females-only hotel. In late 1852, she endeavoured to return to Jamaica but racial discrimination from American ships delayed her journey as she had to wait for a British ship.  In 1853, Seacole was asked by the Jamaican authorities to treat victims of yellow fever, however the severity of the outbreak left her unable to do much.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seacole returned to Panama in early 1854 to finalise her business affairs. Upon hearing of the escalating crisis leading to the Crimean war, she determined to travel to England to volunteer as a nurse, expressing a desire to experience the "pomp, pride and circumstance of glorious war". She also knew some of the soldiers deployed in the war and wished to care for them again.

Thousands of troops across Europe succumbed to cholera and disease on or awaiting deployment to the battlefields. Seacole had travelled Panama to England, initially to deal with her investments in gold-mining businesses. She applied to join a contingent of nurses being sent to the front, but her application was denied. She dealt with this somewhat more graciously than I would have, revealing an awareness that her ethnicity and nationality stood against her: "Now, I am not for a single instant going to blame the authorities who would not listen to the offer of a motherly yellow woman to go to the Crimea and nurse her "sons" there, suffering from cholera, diarrhoea, and a host of lesser ills. In my country, where people know our use, it would have been different; but here it was natural enough – although I had references, and other voices spoke for me – that they should laugh, good-naturedly enough, at my offer."

Seacole also applied to the Crimean Fund, a fund raised by public subscription to support the wounded in Crimea, for sponsorship to travel there, but she again met with refusal. Seacole questioned whether racism was a factor in her being turned down: ‘Did these ladies shrink from accepting my aid because my blood flowed beneath a somewhat duskier skin than theirs?". She also ‘had an interview this time with one of Miss Nightingale's companions. She gave me the same reply, and I read in her face the fact, that had there been a vacancy, I should not have been chosen to fill it." She was also refused by the Secretary-at-War and his wife. Nightingale herself reportedly wrote, "I had the greatest difficulty in repelling Mrs Seacole's advances, and in preventing association between her and my nurses (absolutely out of the question!)...Anyone who employs Mrs Seacole will introduce much kindness - also much drunkenness and improper conduct".

Seacole finally resolved to travel to Crimea using her own resources and to open the British Hotel. Shortly afterwards, a friend from the Caribbean arrived unexpectedly in London, and the two formed a partnership. Seacole travelled to Constantinople in 1855, where she met a doctor who wrote her a letter of introduction to Nightingale. Seacole visited Nightingale at the Barrack Hospital in Scutari, where she asked for a bed for the night. Then she set out on the four-day voyage into Crimea at Balaclava.[78]

Lacking proper building materials, Seacole gathered abandoned metal and wood in her spare moments, with a view to using the debris to build her hotel using hired local labour. The “hotel” opened in March 1855. Seacole was advised to focus on food and drink, rather than having overnight board. The hotel was completed in July at a total cost of £800.Despite consistent thefts, Mary’s business flourished. She hired two black chefs but often prepared the food herself when not completing medical duties such as distributing medicines.  

An associate of both Seacole and Nightingale believed that the two women spoke highly of each other and their respective works. However, Nightingale apparently  did not want her nurses associating with Seacole. Seacole often went out to serve troops as a civilian merchant and attending to casualties. She became widely known amongst the British troops as “Mother Seacole”.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apart from serving officers at the British Hotel, Seacole also provided catering for spectators at the battles. On one occasion, attending wounded troops under fire, she dislocated her right thumb, an injury which never healed entirely.

In 1855, William Howard Russell, special correspondent of The Times, wrote that she was a "warm and successful physician, who doctors and cures all manner of men with extraordinary success… she was "both a Miss Nightingale and a [chef]". She purposefully wore bright and conspicuous clothing.  Her peers, though wary initially, soon appreciated Seacole’s value for medical assistance and morale: ‘a coloured women who out of the goodness of her heart and at her own expense, supplied hot tea to the poor sufferers…. She did not spare herself if she could do any good to the suffering soldiers. In rain and snow, in storm and tempest, day after day …Sometimes more than 200 sick would be embarked in one day, but Mrs. Seacole was always equal, to the occasion". Seacole did more than carry tea to the suffering soldiers. She often carried bags of lint, bandages, needles and thread to tend to the wounds of soldiers.

In September 1855, Seacole became the first British woman to enter Sevastopol after it fell. She toured the broken town with refreshments and visited the hospitals crowded with thousands of dead and dying Russians. Her foreign appearance drew the attentions of French looters, but she was rescued by a passing officer. She looted some items from the city, which randomly included a church bell and a 10 ft painting of the Madonna.

The business of Seacole and Day prospered in the interim period, with the officers taking the opportunity to enjoy themselves in the quieter days. There were theatrical performances and horse-racing events for which Seacole provided catering. Seacole was joined by a 14-year-old girl described as "the Egyptian beauty, Mrs Seacole's daughter Sarah". There rumours that she was Mary’s illegitimate child, but was more likely to have been the illegitimate child of her business partner.

The Treaty of Paris was signed on 30 March 1856, after which the soldiers left Crimea putting Mary in a difficult financial position. She attempted to sell as much as possible before the soldiers left, but was forced to auction many expensive goods for lower-than-expected prices to the Russian. The evacuation of the Allied armies was formally completed at Balaclava on 9 July 1856, with Seacole "... conspicuous in the foreground ... dressed in a plaid riding-habit ...". Mary was one of the last to leave Crimea, returning to England "poorer than [she] left it".However, she had left a lasting impact on the soldiers, as a paper reported: "Perhaps at first the authorities looked askant at the woman-volunteer; but they soon found her worth and utility…Mother Seacole was a household word in the camp...she attended many patients, nursed many sick, and earned the good will and gratitude of hundreds". Seacole returned to England destitute and sickly. She was declared bankrupt in November 1856.



Seacole began to wear military medals including the British Crimea Medal, the French Légion d'honneur and the Turkish Order of the Medjidie medal. However, there is no formal evidence of her having been presented with one so it seems likely that she purchased the medals to display her respect for her “sons” in the Army.  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Media awareness of Mary’s difficulties resulted in a fundraising campaign to which many prominent people donated. This moved her out of bankruptcy but she remained poor and struggiing. In Punch's 30 May edition, she was heavily criticised for a letter she sent begging her favorite magazine, which she claimed to have often read to her British Crimean War patients, to assist her in gaining donations. Further fund-raising and literary mentions kept Seacole in the public eye. In May 1857 she wanted to travel to India, to minister to the wounded of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, Another successful fundraiser supported by the military raised her £57, a quarter of which had to pay for the event itself.  


Her autobiography, Wonderful Adventures of Mrs. Seacole in Many Lands, was published in 1857, the first autobiography written by a black woman in Britain. She wrote of her childhood practising medicine on domestic animals and of her destitution on returning to London while others had returned wealthy. She writes that she was personally protected by her soldier “sons” on the battle field. She concluded by descriving her career as her ‘pride and pleasure.’ It was received favourably: "If singleness of heart, true charity and Christian works- of trials and sufferings, dangers and perils, encountered boldly by a helpless women on her errand of mercy in the camp and in the battlefield can excite sympathy or move curiosity, Mary Seacole will have many friends and many readers".

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Around 1860, Mary became a Roman Catholic and returned to a newly-empoverished Jamacia, where she became a prominent figure. However, by 1867 she was again running low on funds and the Seacole fund was resurrected in London, with new patrons including the Prince of Wales, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Duke of Cambridge, and many other senior military officers. The fund burgeoned, and Seacole was able to buy land on which to build a home and a rental property.

By 1870, Seacole was back in London, possibly enticed by the prospect of aiding the medical efforts of the Franco-Prussian War. It was at this time Nightingale wrote her letter to insinuating that Seacole had kept a "bad house" in Crimea, and was responsible for "much drunkenness and improper conduct".

In London, Seacole joined the periphery of the royal circle, sitting for a marble bust that was shown at The Great Exhibition and becoming a personal masseuse to the Princess of Wales who was suffering from arthritis. 

Seacole died of apoplexy in London in 1881. While well known at the end of her life, Seacole rapidly faded from British public memory. However, in recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in her and efforts to properly acknowledge her achievements. She has become an example of racial attitudes and social injustices in Britain in the nineteenth century. She was cited as an example of "hidden" black history in Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses (1988): "See, here is Mary Seacole, who did as much in the Crimea as another magic-lamping lady, but, being dark, could scarce be seen for the flame of Florence's candle." She has been better remembered in the Caribbean.

By the 21st century, Seacole was much more prominent in British history. Several buildings and entities, mainly connected with health care, were named after her. In 2005, Boris Johnson wrote of learning about Seacole from his daughter's school and speculated: "I find myself facing the grim possibility that it was my own education that was blinkered." In 2007 Seacole was introduced into the National Curriculum, and her life story is taught at many primary schools in the UK alongside that of Florence Nightingale. In 2004, she was voted Greatest Black Briton.

A controversial statue of Seacole was erected at St Thomas’ Hospital in London in 2016. It is inscribed with the words written by Russell in The Times in 1857:"I trust that England will not forget one who nursed her sick, who sought out her wounded to aid and succour them, and who performed the last offices for some of her illustrious dead.’

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mary Seacole was a successful mixed-race immigrant to Britain who led an eventful life. She was kind and generous who was popular with all those who knew her. While her cures have been vastly exaggerated, she doubtless did what she could to ease suffering, when no effective cures existed.

Seacole's recognition has been controversial as it is seen as disrespectful to Florence Nightingale. A letter to The Times from the Florence Nightingale Society and signed by members including historians  asserted that "Seacole's battlefield excursions ... took place post-battle, after selling wine and sandwiches to spectators. Mrs Seacole was a kind and generous businesswoman, but was not a frequenter of the battlefield "under fire" or a pioneer of nursing…She deserves much credit for rising to the occasion, but her tea and lemonade did not save lives, pioneer nursing or advance health care".

However, other historians maintain that claims that Seacole only served "tea and lemonade" do a disservice to the tradition of Jamaican "doctresses". They all used herbal remedies and hygienic practices in the late eighteenth century, long before Nightingale. Mark Bostridge points out that Seacole's experience far outstripped Nightingale's, and that the Jamaican's work comprised preparing medicines, diagnosis, and minor surgery. They posit that race plays a part in the resistance to Seacole by some of Nightingale's supporters, stating that in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, Seacole often had greater success than the European-trained doctors. These doctresses of Jamaica practised hygiene long before Nightingale, and it is possible that Nightingale learned about the value of hygiene in nursing from the practices of Seacole.

At the end of 2012 it was reported that Mary Seacole was to be removed from the National Curriculum. A lot of commentators do not accept the view that Seacole's accomplishments were exaggerated, suggesting that this idea is propositioned by the English elite that was determined to suppress and hide the black contribution in Britain. Helen Seaton observes that Nightingale fitted the English ideal of a Victorian heroine more than a dark-skinned Seacole, who battled racial prejudice who did not understand her ways. In 2013 Operation Black Vote succeeded in petitioning parliament to keep Mary on the curriculum.


In my opinion, both Seacole and Nightingale were amazing women who did all they could to aid British forces during the war. The need to compare them is to me symptomatic of the patriarchal tendency to force women to compete and see each other as threats rather than allies. However, it cannot be denied that opposition to celebration of Mary is highly likely to have a racist undertone. While her race shouldn’t come into it at all, if anything it makes her achievements even more remarkable in that she lacked any support from the government and that she still persevered at great personal cost to serve a country by which she had been repeatedly rejected. Her pride in her ethnicity, her resolve not to let prejudice limit her accomplishments, and her blending of western and traditional medicines are a beautiful example of how one’s skin colour and birthplace do not define your nationality or worth to a nation. For me, Seacole is symbolic of the interconnection of the empire and the world, and the interlinked history that countries across the globe and their citizens share despite the nationalist rhetoric which would have you believe otherwise.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elizabeth Taylor

Women's Experiences in the Partition of India

Nzginha Mande